Proper rules
Post 1
Started conversation Aug 2, 2009
Interesting point - if douglas adams started the guide - there cannot of been any other researchers - as such his entries cannot have passed peer review therefore his entries under normal h2g2 rules should be deleted.
Solution
Douglas Adams is a demi-god and as such his points are naturally assumed to have been agreed with by all .
Question - has anyone found atypo in his message?
Proper rules
Post 2
Posted Aug 5, 2009
Entries aren't deleted because they didn't go through PR. In the 'olden' days uni projects completely missed PR, and I've got at least two pre-PR entries that were accepted by the Eds without anyone else having a look in. Also my two uni projects were pre-PR too.
Very occasionally entries that are nonsense are demoted, but never deleted. Even bad entries are just marked for needing an update.
Proper rules
Post 3
Posted Aug 5, 2009
ahhh, how many people did h2g2 have before the new stuff came in, PR, being linked to the bbc etc?
Proper rules
Post 4
Posted Aug 6, 2009
There have been numerous attempts to count active users over the years, but I couldn't even begin to think about where to look for them. Official stats were never divulged.
Proper rules
Post 5
Posted Aug 6, 2009
hmm it would be good to know how many h2g2 users have say posted within the last 2 months.
Also why are the h2g2 editors called italics?
Key:
Complain about this post