Conversation:

A Conversation for Rubik’s cube

No Subject

Post 1

Anonymouse

Started conversation Sep 22, 2001

Aw.. c'mon.. don't delete smiley - starRubik's cubesmiley - star! smiley - smiley

smiley - rose

I didn't...

Post 2

The Dancing Tree

Posted Oct 21, 2001

... it looks like this is a 'limbo' article, as snenerd edited it, but it never made the official guide. Oh well...

I didn't...

Post 3

Anonymouse

Posted Oct 31, 2001

Hasn't Peer reviewed it yet? smiley - huh

smiley - rose

I didn't...

Post 4

The Dancing Tree

Posted Nov 4, 2001

I've no idea -- the article was written at least a year before the Peer Review even existed (and prior to the fisrt lot of sub-editors being introduced -- ah, back then it were all fields 'round here!)

I guess it's one that slipped through the gap, although it wasn't a particularly great article anyway, if I remember correctly. smiley - smiley

I didn't...

Post 5

Anonymouse

Posted Nov 23, 2001

Well I can't tell that now, Can I? smiley - winkeye Is your original still about?

I thought they did all the approved entries (edited) during the rupert. Prolly didn't get around to one queue or t'other. *sigh* Wonder how many other gems (they -must- be gems.. they were approved after all!!) got lost along the way.

smiley - rose

I didn't...

Post 6

The Dancing Tree

Posted Dec 20, 2001

Most of my H2g2 stuff is probably on some back-up CDR somewhere. I guess the actual article is still within the DB on the BBC. Who knows? smiley - smiley

Key:

Complain about this post